However, since the binary is publicly available on their, I believe they are required to make the source publicly available also. SCO's cited intent that the site is only to be used by paying customers is irrelevant. The public distribution of the binary requires distribution of the source on the same terms: public.
At least that's my opinion. IANAL, etc.
~ Merkey v The Internet et al Docs ~ Yahoeuvre ~ tuxrocks.com (SCO cases legal docs) ~ scofacts.org ~ eagle.petrofsky.org ~ Zen's Den ~ Yahoo SCOX Message Board ~ Lamlaw ~ Microsoft Watch ~ Groklaw ~ Korgwal - a Groklaw mirror ~ nosoftwarepatents.com ~ Flame Warriors ~ SCOXE Wars ~ Get your Merkey Number here! ~ Digital Law Online
Make a new account