IP-WARS.NET || Comments || PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts

PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts | 300 comments (300 topical, editorial, 2 hidden)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts (4.06 / 15) (#62)
by wonboodoo on Sun Nov 14th, 2004 at 12:17:24 EST
(User Info)

You are treading a fine line here. IP-Wars a chance to become a great site, ground-zero in the whole IP debate. There are some legitimate problems with Groklaw relating to the comment deletion and copyright policies. But this article in my opinion is nothing but nit-picking. If you look at PJ's article her paragraph was there simply to refute (in her opinion) that the OSRM will not cover IP liability on modified Linux source. Sure she dressed the paragraph up but really, big deal. Is it worth a dedicated IP-Wars article to go over every word PJ uses in every article? I mean making an issue with her use of the word "hasten" and dropping in a comment like "oblique in classic PJ style" is starting to reek of PJ hatred.
Is there a conflict of interest with PJ's Groklaw and her role in OSRM? Sure. But find something more substantive than this trivial paragraph before dragging PJ over the fire.
I'd love to see IP-Wars become command-central but articles like this are pulling it towards PJ-bashing fluff.

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by heimdal31, 11/14/2004 14:25:53 EST (3.77 / 9)
Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by ColonelZen, 11/14/2004 14:11:06 EST (3.66 / 9)
Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by infosecgroupie, 11/14/2004 14:40:53 EST (3.58 / 12)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by wonboodoo, 11/14/2004 21:09:23 EST (4.38 / 13)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by infosecgroupie, 11/15/2004 02:55:25 EST (4.08 / 12)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by wonboodoo, 11/15/2004 09:45:49 EST (4.25 / 12)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by mikey, 11/15/2004 10:23:54 EST (4.00 / 7)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by br3n, 11/15/2004 10:39:53 EST (3.60 / 5)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by infosecgroupie, 11/15/2004 11:38:37 EST (3.84 / 13)
Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by Potential Recruit, 11/15/2004 10:46:19 EST (1.66 / 6)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by mikey, 11/15/2004 11:32:43 EST (4.54 / 11)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by br3n, 11/15/2004 12:09:20 EST (3.40 / 5)

Content of this site by sphealey, 11/15/2004 10:49:55 EST (3.87 / 8)

Re: Content of this site by br3n, 11/15/2004 10:57:20 EST (3.50 / 4)
Re: Content of this site by Potential Recruit, 11/15/2004 10:57:11 EST (3.08 / 12)

Re: Content of this site by sphealey, 11/16/2004 13:43:53 EST (4.00 / 4)
Re: Content of this site by mikey, 11/16/2004 13:47:12 EST (4.00 / 8)
Re: Content of this site by pgk, 11/15/2004 13:01:42 EST (3.85 / 7)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by Potential Recruit, 11/15/2004 10:50:34 EST (2.20 / 10)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by br3n, 11/15/2004 10:54:44 EST (4.00 / 4)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by Potential Recruit, 11/15/2004 11:01:12 EST (3.11 / 9)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by nono2sco, 11/15/2004 11:11:14 EST (3.85 / 7)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by Potential Recruit, 11/15/2004 11:16:27 EST (2.60 / 10)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by nono2sco, 11/15/2004 11:29:34 EST (4.00 / 7)
Re: Editorial control by mck9, 11/15/2004 11:43:51 EST (3.90 / 10)

Re: Editorial control by JCausey, 11/15/2004 14:41:35 EST (4.14 / 7)
Re: Editorial control by mikey, 11/15/2004 11:52:04 EST (4.00 / 5)

Re: Editorial control by JCausey, 11/15/2004 14:34:26 EST (4.28 / 7)

Re: Editorial control by pgk, 11/15/2004 15:53:49 EST (3.66 / 3)

Re: Editorial control by sphealey, 11/15/2004 16:09:08 EST (4.00 / 5)

Re: Editorial control by nono2sco, 11/15/2004 16:41:31 EST (none / 2)

Re: Editorial control by mikey, 11/15/2004 15:15:32 EST (3.50 / 4)
Re: Editorial control by mikey, 11/15/2004 15:18:28 EST (3.50 / 4)

Re: Editorial control by JCausey, 11/15/2004 15:21:42 EST (4.00 / 5)

Re: Editorial control by mikey, 11/15/2004 15:25:13 EST (none / 2)

Re: Editorial control by nono2sco, 11/15/2004 12:19:13 EST (3.80 / 5)

Re: Editorial control by nono2sco, 11/15/2004 12:21:23 EST (4.00 / 5)
Re: Editorial control by mikey, 11/15/2004 12:54:02 EST (4.00 / 6)

Re: Editorial control by nono2sco, 11/15/2004 13:06:35 EST (4.00 / 5)

Re: Editorial control by nono2sco, 11/15/2004 12:09:34 EST (4.00 / 6)
Re: Editorial control by pgk, 11/15/2004 13:11:10 EST (3.66 / 6)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by nono2sco, 11/14/2004 21:32:58 EST (3.71 / 7)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by mikey, 11/14/2004 21:39:33 EST (4.14 / 7)
Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by destroy all monsters, 11/16/2004 13:10:40 EST (3.85 / 7)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by nono2sco, 11/16/2004 13:34:11 EST (none / 2)

Re: PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts by nono2sco, 11/14/2004 21:39:54 EST (3.57 / 7)

PJ and OSRM: her most recent thoughts | 300 comments (300 topical, 0 editorial, 2 hidden)

Recent Diaries

SCO has a Potential and Credible BILLION Dollar Liability
by ColonelZen - March 15

The Chinese Room Revisited, Thoughts on Consciousness
by ColonelZen - November 24
1 comment

Advocacy
by br3n - October 29
3 comments

An IPOWER ful experience
by ColonelZen - September 25
6 comments

Learning C#
by ColonelZen - September 23
1 comment

Getting ruby DBI for Mysql and Postgresql working on FC 6
by ColonelZen - March 7

Declaration of Linus Torvalds
by nedu - February 13
1 comment

Declaration of M. Douglas McIlroy
by nedu - February 12
6 comments

Declaration of Ulrich Drepper
by nedu - February 11
1 comment

Declaration of K. Y. Srinivasan
by nedu - February 11

More Diaries...

Login

Make a new account

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies or owners.
Comments, articles and logbooks are owned by the Poster. By posting on the ip-wars.net web site, all posters grant a license to ip-wars.net to publish the content and release it pursuant to the Creative Commons License that covers the rest of the site. For more details, please check out the Standard Operating Procedures. Also, please read the Privacy Policy for the site. Finally, DO NOT send e-mail to the site owner (Jeff Causey) unless you have read and agree to the terms regarding e-mail included in the Standard Operating Procedures.
Everything else � 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 ip-wars.net and Jeffrey G. Causey and is licensed under a

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Links

Recent Comments

Recent Diaries

Login