I have some on-topic questions--and I'll state my intent to rate very lowly any off-topic responses in this particular thread. (And if you log in, you can see my ratings.)
When I write the above response to Len Newman, I did feel that I could trust both he and Bruce. However, I still had (and have) concerns about the system that was being set up. I was attempting to give Len a run-down of all the complaints whether I agreed with them or not.
After reading the e-mail exchange that Mikey had, I'm even more reassured than I was, but I still have these structural concerns.
So, my question is, did I leave out major concerns? Is there some area or direction of potential Patent Project criticism that I missed? And I am focusing this distinctly on the patent project, which is run by Len Newman. I use the Unix project robots.txt file just as an example to help with my point.
As I understand it the two projects, while hosted at the same site and using the same infrastructure, are completely separate projects that have very little to do with each other. The Patent Project is Len's and it was his project that I am addressing.
So, since he had asked me to summarize the issues, is there something I've left out? ---Tim Rushing
~ Merkey v The Internet et al Docs ~ Yahoeuvre ~ tuxrocks.com (SCO cases legal docs) ~ scofacts.org ~ eagle.petrofsky.org ~ Zen's Den ~ Yahoo SCOX Message Board ~ Lamlaw ~ Microsoft Watch ~ Groklaw ~ Korgwal - a Groklaw mirror ~ nosoftwarepatents.com ~ Flame Warriors ~ SCOXE Wars ~ Get your Merkey Number here! ~ Digital Law Online
Make a new account