IP-WARS.NET || Comments || A Brief History of GrokWar

A Brief History of GrokWar | 311 comments (307 topical, 4 editorial, 7 hidden)

PJ Stoops To A New Low (4.25 / 8) (#241)
by JCausey (jcausey@ip-wars.net) on Sun Nov 28th, 2004 at 00:23:21 EST
(User Info) http://www.ip-wars.net

The following is a redacted version of post #236 on this article by nono2sco. Subsequent to the posting, I received notice (though not directly from the person alleging copyright infringement), that inclusion of all of N.'s comments from Groklaw was a violation of N.'s copyright on his post. Although I believe it would be necessary for N. to actually contact me regarding the possible infringement, I am going to proceed proactively in removing the potential copyright violation. If you'd like to read the entire posting by N., please visit the Groklaw site. As is noted in this site's policy, one of the few instances in which material may be deleted is when a copyright violation may occur.

*****************
During a recent exchange of messages on GrokLaw Jeff Causey posted the following message on GrokLaw.

But the feedback is "Nasty"
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 27 2004 @ 01:53 PM EST
N.,
You really should be more careful what you believe and what you post.
>>he makes a substantial amount of income from Microsoft-based systems<<
This is absolutely false. I make no income from the recommendation, sale, or maintenance of MS based systems. I'm not sure whether there is any other way to make income from MS-based systems, but if there is, I don't make any from it.
>>is a willing fool<<
Well, name-calling is always an effective debate technique.
Jeff Causey
Site owner - www.ip-wars.net

Subsequently this message was edited by PJ, removing Jeff's name and title.

"But the feedback is "Nasty"
Authored by: PJ on Saturday, November 27 2004 @ 07:28 PM EST
This is the remains of a comment by Jeff Causey. The rest was rude and included advertising, but while I deleted it, I am preserving his defense of his Microsoft work. He wrote this:
N.,
You really should be more careful what you believe and what you post.
>>he makes a substantial amount of income from Microsoft-based systems This is absolutely false. I make no income from the recommendation, sale, or maintenance of MS based systems. I'm not sure whether there is any other way to make income from MS-based systems, but if there is, I don't make any from it."

Notice that she runs N's and Jeff's messages together.

So that leaves the rude and advertising parts...

">>is a willing fool<<
Well, name-calling is always an effective debate technique.
Jeff Causey
Site owner - www.ip-wars.net"

The original post by N was ...

[redacted]
either the webmaster has an agenda (he makes a substantial amount of income from Microsoft-based systems, so you could read in a distinct conflict of interest there), or is a willing fool being given ideas by people he thinks are his comrades.
[redacted]

I guess PJ was worried that Jeff's title was shameless advertising and that "Well, name-calling is always an effective debate technique." might offend those on GrokLaw with sensitive constitutions.

I am hoping that eventually the posters on GrokLaw will wake up and realize they are not getting the whole story.
-
-
__ "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" -- Lord Acton

Re: PJ Stoops To A New Low by JCausey, 11/28/2004 00:28:43 EST (4.37 / 8)

Re: PJ Stoops To A New Low by br3n, 11/28/2004 07:48:54 EST (3.50 / 6)

Re: PJ Stoops To A New Low by mrbuttle, 11/28/2004 09:41:36 EST (3.85 / 7)

Re: PJ Stoops To A New Low by total insanity, 11/28/2004 14:07:18 EST (4.00 / 3)

Re: PJ Stoops To A New Low by br3n, 11/28/2004 15:39:53 EST (3.25 / 4)

Re: PJ Stoops To A New Low by br3n, 11/28/2004 09:46:08 EST (3.16 / 6)

Re: Jeff Stoops To A New Low by Potential Recruit, 11/30/2004 01:24:52 EST (1.55 / 9)

Re: Jeff Stoops To A New Low by JCausey, 11/30/2004 10:12:31 EST (4.42 / 7)
Re: Jeff Stoops To A New Low by nono2sco, 11/30/2004 02:07:27 EST (3.16 / 6)

More Apparent Deletions... by nono2sco, 11/28/2004 02:51:09 EST (4.00 / 6)
I'm in the "Jeff stoops to new low" camp by wallybass, 12/01/2004 22:32:33 EST (2.22 / 9)

Re: I'm in the "Jeff stoops to new low" by JCausey, 12/01/2004 23:01:30 EST (4.44 / 9)

Re: I'm in the "Jeff stoops to new low" by wallybass, 12/02/2004 14:51:53 EST (2.33 / 9)

Re: I'm in the "Jeff stoops to new low" by JCausey, 12/02/2004 19:20:00 EST (4.83 / 6)

Re: I'm in the "Jeff stoops to new low" by nono2sco, 12/01/2004 23:01:56 EST (3.85 / 7)

Re: I'm in the "Jeff stoops to new low" by wallybass, 12/02/2004 15:00:09 EST (3.33 / 9)

Re: I'm in the "Jeff stoops to new low" by nono2sco, 12/02/2004 16:31:33 EST (4.66 / 6)

Re: I'm in the "Jeff stoops to new low" by codswallet, 12/03/2004 20:01:42 EST (3.77 / 9)

Re: I'm in the "Jeff stoops to new low" by nono2sco, 12/03/2004 20:13:06 EST (3.33 / 6)

Why? by ColonelZen, 12/02/2004 16:44:41 EST (3.60 / 5)

Re: Why? - side thread by wallybass, 12/02/2004 20:13:19 EST (3.50 / 6)

Re: Why? - side thread by ColonelZen, 12/02/2004 21:59:06 EST (4.50 / 6)

Re: Why? - side thread by nono2sco, 12/03/2004 12:19:02 EST (3.60 / 5)

Re: Why? - side thread by ColonelZen, 12/03/2004 15:38:29 EST (3.60 / 5)

Re: Why? - side thread by nono2sco, 12/03/2004 15:57:36 EST (3.75 / 4)

Re: Why? - side thread by wallybass, 12/03/2004 00:54:04 EST (3.50 / 8)

Re: Why? - side thread by JCausey, 12/03/2004 08:36:55 EST (3.66 / 6)

Re: Why? - side thread by wallybass, 12/03/2004 12:26:50 EST (3.50 / 6)

Re: Why? - side thread by ColonelZen, 12/03/2004 13:32:22 EST (3.50 / 4)

Re: Why? - side thread by wallybass, 12/03/2004 14:06:51 EST (3.33 / 6)

Re: Why? - side thread by codswallet, 12/03/2004 20:17:02 EST (3.33 / 6)
dictionary pitfalls by codswallet, 12/03/2004 20:55:06 EST (3.20 / 5)

Re: dictionary pitfalls by nono2sco, 12/03/2004 21:03:37 EST (3.00 / 4)
Re: dictionary pitfalls by ColonelZen, 12/03/2004 22:04:52 EST (3.00 / 5)

moderation failure by codswallet, 12/03/2004 18:44:33 EST (3.50 / 6)

Re: moderation failure by nono2sco, 12/03/2004 19:13:20 EST (3.33 / 6)
Re: moderation failure by pgk, 12/03/2004 18:52:26 EST (3.00 / 5)

Re: moderation failure by wallybass, 12/04/2004 00:26:30 EST (3.83 / 6)

Re: moderation failure by nono2sco, 12/04/2004 00:42:26 EST (3.00 / 4)

definition failure by codswallet, 12/04/2004 04:14:58 EST (3.00 / 6)

Re: definition failure by nono2sco, 12/04/2004 10:30:56 EST (3.75 / 4)

A Brief History of GrokWar | 311 comments (307 topical, 4 editorial, 7 hidden)

Recent Diaries

SCO has a Potential and Credible BILLION Dollar Liability
by ColonelZen - March 15

The Chinese Room Revisited, Thoughts on Consciousness
by ColonelZen - November 24
1 comment

Advocacy
by br3n - October 29
3 comments

An IPOWER ful experience
by ColonelZen - September 25
6 comments

Learning C#
by ColonelZen - September 23
1 comment

Getting ruby DBI for Mysql and Postgresql working on FC 6
by ColonelZen - March 7

Declaration of Linus Torvalds
by nedu - February 13
1 comment

Declaration of M. Douglas McIlroy
by nedu - February 12
6 comments

Declaration of Ulrich Drepper
by nedu - February 11
1 comment

Declaration of K. Y. Srinivasan
by nedu - February 11

More Diaries...

Login

Make a new account

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies or owners.
Comments, articles and logbooks are owned by the Poster. By posting on the ip-wars.net web site, all posters grant a license to ip-wars.net to publish the content and release it pursuant to the Creative Commons License that covers the rest of the site. For more details, please check out the Standard Operating Procedures. Also, please read the Privacy Policy for the site. Finally, DO NOT send e-mail to the site owner (Jeff Causey) unless you have read and agree to the terms regarding e-mail included in the Standard Operating Procedures.
Everything else � 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 ip-wars.net and Jeffrey G. Causey and is licensed under a

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Links

Recent Comments

Recent Diaries

Login