The letter clearly specifies trade secrets - which SCO has admitted (in court documents) that they don't have - so even if SCO had the right to terminate the agreement, the termination never happened, because of the following line:
unless within the period of such notice all breaches specified therein shall have been remedied
Since the "breach" was remedied before the 100 days expired (because there are no trade secrets), the termination was automatically nullified by the Agreement.
So once again, we have a case of Darl's own words destroying his case. At least he's consistent.
~ Merkey v The Internet et al Docs ~ Yahoeuvre ~ tuxrocks.com (SCO cases legal docs) ~ scofacts.org ~ eagle.petrofsky.org ~ Zen's Den ~ Yahoo SCOX Message Board ~ Lamlaw ~ Microsoft Watch ~ Groklaw ~ Korgwal - a Groklaw mirror ~ nosoftwarepatents.com ~ Flame Warriors ~ SCOXE Wars ~ Get your Merkey Number here! ~ Digital Law Online
Make a new account