As he is now beginning to repeat himself without answering or addressing the substance of the responses, particularly the primary tenet that the issues rasied are mostly ones of ethics and community interest not law or (by third parties at least) civilly actionable, I have begun zero rating such as spam/crapflood. I shall try use reasonable powers of discrimination and not zero anything I now see which contains new substance, but my overall interest in what he has to say (and the article topic generally) is relatively low, so I may make mistakes. Please use your own judgement and feel free to rate to override my zero if you think there is new substance I may have missed.
-- TWZ
~ Merkey v The Internet et al Docs ~ Yahoeuvre ~ tuxrocks.com (SCO cases legal docs) ~ scofacts.org ~ eagle.petrofsky.org ~ Zen's Den ~ Yahoo SCOX Message Board ~ Lamlaw ~ Microsoft Watch ~ Groklaw ~ Korgwal - a Groklaw mirror ~ nosoftwarepatents.com ~ Flame Warriors ~ SCOXE Wars ~ Get your Merkey Number here! ~ Digital Law Online
Make a new account