historical information about the development of software from its origins through the present day."

You need to prove a cause and effect relationship here. Simply saying one occured later in time then the other proves nothing.  I am not talking about scientific proof, it's enough for you to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

"The impression given is that donations are not to be for "commercial purposes" under the terms of the CCL non-commercial license:"

I read that paragraph and I didn't get that impression. How come you got that impression. the paragraph says nothing about non commercial use or the CCL.

Since you are here to bash OSRM over this issue one presumes you chose the most damnimg paragraph you can find and it turns out to be innocuous.

"So far the disclosure has been sketchy."

I don't think there is anything OSRM, Grokline, Groklaw, PJ, SRA or anybody even remotely involved with them can do to satisfy you. No matter what they say you will find some evil intent, no matter how many questions they answer you will still brood about "unanswered questions", no matter how much they publish the information will be "sketchy".