Probably the fed courts don't have that kind of self defense mechanism; but some sua-sponte motion to dismiss by the court is not unlikely, otherwise any response by any defendant pointing out a procedural error is likely to result in a complete dismissal.
I would bet money there's a green star, or piece of yellow tape, or orange bookmark, or blue paperclip attached to this which will let any hearing judge know this is squirrel bait, and "dismiss for any possible reason".
IANAL, just pointing out that bureaucracies do develop some mechanisms to cope with idiocy on this scale. They don't work as well as might be desirable, but at some level they are likely to kick in.
-- TWZ
~ Merkey v The Internet et al Docs ~ Yahoeuvre ~ tuxrocks.com (SCO cases legal docs) ~ scofacts.org ~ eagle.petrofsky.org ~ Zen's Den ~ Yahoo SCOX Message Board ~ Lamlaw ~ Microsoft Watch ~ Groklaw ~ Korgwal - a Groklaw mirror ~ nosoftwarepatents.com ~ Flame Warriors ~ SCOXE Wars ~ Get your Merkey Number here! ~ Digital Law Online
Make a new account