I'll take a crack at a couple comments. I have been watching the whole AJAX phenomenon as well. Interestingly enough, a few weeks ago I ran into something somewhere by a bunch of IE developers who were bashing AJAX as being slow and unsafe. It sounded to me like they just didn't want to have to code for anything non-MS.
Also, I noted your comment about FF being the closest to a W3C compliance. I just saw something that showed Opera as being more compliant. Even those were beat by some small user-base browsers that are designed specifically to be compliant (though I'm guessing they lack some features as a result of that). I'll have to see if I can find one of the sites referenced - it was a pretty cool demonstration of how IE botches up something very simple involving background images.
Jeff [ Parent ]
~ Merkey v The Internet et al Docs ~ Yahoeuvre ~ tuxrocks.com (SCO cases legal docs) ~ scofacts.org ~ eagle.petrofsky.org ~ Zen's Den ~ Yahoo SCOX Message Board ~ Lamlaw ~ Microsoft Watch ~ Groklaw ~ Korgwal - a Groklaw mirror ~ nosoftwarepatents.com ~ Flame Warriors ~ SCOXE Wars ~ Get your Merkey Number here! ~ Digital Law Online
Make a new account