The best way to fight idiocy is with more idiocy.

Hark!  I have just had a Revelation, received a sacred calling!

I hereby declare and create the Church of the Numerati, a calling and mission to bring people a closer understanding of the Nature of the Universe and Mind of God through Logic.

We are not exclusionary.  Those who believe as we need not forswear other beliefs and are in fact encouraged to compare and contrast and to seek enlightenment by reconciliation of other doctrines with our dogma wherever possible.

All Working Programs, in Whatever Language and Form are Hereby Considered Sacred Writings.  What Better Testimony of the Sanctity of the Human Mind than Expression of Ones Own Divine Thoughts in Dynamic and Reactive Form Outside Ones Body?  What Holier Purpose Can There Be than to Express Our Own Poor Understanding of the Mind of God than to Demonstrate that It Works in the Wider World, and to Share that with Ones Brothers and Sisters?

Thou Art Encouraged and Called Upon to Write Programs, to Express Algorithms and to Demonstrate Holy Logic, to Show the Nature of the Universe in Programs and Yes, even Lowly Scripts.

Thou Art Sanctified and Blessed to Share Thine Programs with Thy Brothers and Sisters in This Church of the Numerati and Communicate Thy Wisdom Revealed by the Sweat of Thy Brow to Other Seekers.

"Moreover, a state actor's negligent act causing unintended injury to a person's property does not "deprive" that person of property within the meaning of the Due Process Clause"

Even if it did, section 5 of the Fourteenth amendment gives Congress "power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, and etc. That is hardly a license for the courts to repeal those statutes. In fact he should petition the Congress to adopt a single federal idea-expression test on the basis of the equal protection clause. The courts could do that on their own though without changing one stanza of the existing copyright act.

The arbitrary nature of the copyright protections that he complains about aren't imposed by statute at all. He admits that much when he says ideas, methods, etc. are already excluded from copyright protection. The courts introduced doctrines like non-literal copying or the use of different standards in different federal districts to test the limits of the idea-expression dichotomy. For example, The 2nd Circuit's Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison test in Altai was adopted and elaborated upon by the 10th in Bando, but the 1st circuit uses a different test adopted in Lotus that others - like the 10th Circuit- have rejected. Thus, it isn't true that "software copyright laws violate due process" because the laws are silent about these matters.

I must confess that I have not read anything this fellow had written. I had a feeling of deja vu though while reading this.

If you had been paying close attention, you could have caught him briefly saying the same thing in a Groklaw article around the time of the Grokline project launch, but there was no hint there about this lawsuit, or any analysis of his remarks. The page you cite about his bashing of Lessig says:

While the big names may get at least a chance for an answer, the choice of information made accessible by GregNews has over the years become very narrowly subservient to his policy goals, and critics are even denied read-only access.

I've just started skimming through the complaint.  I did note that he cites the Computer Associates International Inc. v. Altai Inc. case (available here at ip-wars.net) quite a bit in one part.

ALL Open Source licensing require copyrights, including the GPL, IBM's CPL, BSD's, Apache, MPL, ASPL, etc.

Taking software copyrights out would leave not only linux but all current software out hanging.

Unix, AIX, Tru64, IRIX, most of those aren't covered under Patents but under copyright.  I would be willing to bet large chucks of Windows is only under copyright & trade secrets.  

If this guy gets his way i am going to patent Graphical user interfaces.  the uses of 2 Dimentional windows to display text and graphics, represted through the use small squares I call pixels.  Sometimes I use vector orenination to draw objects, and sometimes I will use straight pixel mapping.