IP-WARS.NET || Accountability

Accountability

By br3n, Section Diary
Posted on Tue Feb 15th, 2005 at 16:56:05 EST

http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=1607394124&tid=ckx&sid=1607394124&mid=14756
this is prime example when a legal research site thumbs their nose at rules and promises they make.it encourages members to ignore rules.
whether the phrase i used is copyrightable is not the issue.it is that cdbaric has no respect for copyright at all.this is the fourth copying of posts from IP-W.
not even attempting to follow the ccl at all.
why didnt he use a link?
could it be because groklaw doesnt allow links so he doesnt know how?
when a legal research site sets the standard low for itself this is the result.
wondering what legal research site i am referring to? of course it is groklaw.
when one of our members copied a post from groklaw and we were told about it,it was almost immediately removed.
we sure havent seen that from groklaw.
jgabriel has asked for his posts to either have the attribution fixed or for them to be deleted as per the site promised when they were posted.
groklaw has ignored this request.
a request was made for someone to code a program to fix the attribution and it was done by one of IP-W members and submitted.
still hasnt been fixed.
continues to ignore.
after all as PJ says "it's my blog"
it is PJ's site.

*note please zero any comments not worth reading.
**note they can mod me down but they cant stop my dairy posts.

< EFF steps into AppleInsider trade secrets row (9 comments) | Bill Gates - A critical bibliography (15 comments) >

Accountability | 40 comments (40 topical, 0 editorial, 3 hidden)

Re: Accountability (3.71 / 7) (#3)
by Potential Recruit on Tue Feb 15th, 2005 at 20:48:50 EST

Br3n, please stop reading that idiot's posts. It obviously upsets you, so why do it? I suppose some people read them for amusement, but nobody takes them seriously.

Re: Accountability by br3n, 02/15/2005 22:08:14 EST (3.33 / 6)

Re: Accountability by fiveoclockcharlie, 02/16/2005 00:59:52 EST (3.14 / 7)

Re: Accountability by mikey, 02/16/2005 01:06:58 EST (4.00 / 5)

Re: Accountability by codswallet, 02/16/2005 10:41:25 EST (4.40 / 5)

Re: Accountability by nono2sco, 02/16/2005 11:22:30 EST (4.00 / 4)

Re: Accountability by br3n, 02/16/2005 11:47:52 EST (3.66 / 3)

Re: Accountability by mikey, 02/16/2005 12:01:08 EST (4.33 / 3)

Re: Accountability by flimbag, 02/16/2005 11:48:17 EST (3.28 / 7)

Re: Accountability by mikey, 02/16/2005 11:58:09 EST (3.40 / 5)

Re: love obsessional by codswallet, 02/16/2005 15:23:28 EST (3.40 / 5)

Re: Accountability by br3n, 02/16/2005 11:55:34 EST (3.00 / 5)

Re: Accountability by JCausey, 02/16/2005 09:38:10 EST (4.00 / 5)

Re: Accountability (2.37 / 8) (#1)
by Potential Recruit on Tue Feb 15th, 2005 at 18:56:13 EST

"http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=1607394124&tid=ckx&sid=1 607394124&mid=14756
this is prime example when a legal research site thumbs their nose at rules and promises they make.it encourages members to ignore rules."

So you think yahoo finance boards are a legal research site?

You also think that finance.yahoo.com polices all the posts to make sure no copyright violations are taking place.

"whether the phrase i used is copyrightable is not the issue.it is that cdbaric has no respect for copyright at all.this is the fourth copying of posts from IP-W."

cdbaric had no respect for copyrights. OK.

"why didnt he use a link?"

Don't know, did you ask him?

"could it be because groklaw doesnt allow links so he doesnt know how?"

WHAT?????????????????

"when a legal research site sets the standard low for itself this is the result.
wondering what legal research site i am referring to? of course it is groklaw."

cdbaric posts copyrighted information on yahoo and it's the fault of groklaw!!!!!!

Of course this bit twisted logic degrades into a typical anti PJ rant you'd hear from a IPW soldier.

"*note please zero any comments not worth reading.
**note they can mod me down but they cant stop my dairy posts."

Of course this does not count as "thumbing your nose at the rules and encouraging your members to thumb their noses at ipw rules".

Pot meet kettle.

What does Groklaw have to do with CKX? (2.14 / 7) (#13)
by Potential Recruit on Wed Feb 16th, 2005 at 00:49:09 EST

Not only that, your "phrase" is about as copyrightable as "Happy Holidays".

Not to mention your flagrant plagiarism:

http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=m&board=1607394124&tid=ckx&mid=13240&sid=160739 4124

http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=m&board=1607394124&tid=ckx&mid=14173&sid=160739 4124

http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=m&board=1607394124&tid=ckx&mid=14118&sid=160739 4124

http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=m&board=1607394124&tid=ckx&mid=13494&sid=160739 4124

http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=m&board=1607394124&tid=ckx&mid=14105&sid=160739 4124

Re: What does Groklaw have to do with CKX? by flimbag, 02/16/2005 12:17:04 EST (3.85 / 7)

Re: What does Groklaw have to do with CKX? by Potential Recruit, 03/17/2005 13:45:22 EST (none / 1)

Re: What does Groklaw have to do with CKX? by Potential Recruit, 03/17/2005 14:07:16 EST (none / 1)

Re: What does Groklaw have to do with CKX? by br3n, 02/16/2005 11:58:28 EST (3.66 / 6)

Re: What does Groklaw have to do with CKX? by fiveoclockcharlie, 02/16/2005 13:38:24 EST (3.25 / 8)

Re: What does Groklaw have to do with CKX? by br3n, 02/16/2005 14:17:06 EST (3.50 / 4)

Re: What does Groklaw have to do with CKX? by codswallet, 02/16/2005 15:28:55 EST (4.00 / 5)

Re: What does Groklaw have to do with CKX? by Potential Recruit, 02/16/2005 03:12:13 EST (2.14 / 7)

Quoth the ghost of Sea Biscuit (2.00 / 3) (#31)
by Robo the Sloth King on Wed Feb 16th, 2005 at 15:28:10 EST
(User Info)

Stop hitting me!!!

People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world. - Calvin & Hobbes

Re: Accountability (1.85 / 7) (#2)
by Potential Recruit on Tue Feb 15th, 2005 at 18:56:57 EST

As usual you ignore the facts Brenda.

John Gabriel has been asked repeatedly to provide a list of his posts, but he has failed to do so. I wonder if his careless disregard for his own comments would be enough to put them into the public domain?

Can't he recognize his own words, or does he just not care?

Why can't you find an issue that has relevance?

Spaceman Spiff

Re: Accountability by nono2sco, 02/15/2005 22:45:37 EST (4.00 / 4)

Re: Accountability by nono2sco, 02/15/2005 22:48:00 EST (4.00 / 3)

Re: Accountability by codswallet, 02/15/2005 23:19:30 EST (4.00 / 6)
Re: Accountability by mikey, 02/16/2005 00:34:12 EST (4.00 / 3)
Re: Accountability by nono2sco, 02/15/2005 21:36:39 EST (3.75 / 4)

Re: Accountability by br3n, 02/15/2005 22:11:47 EST (3.25 / 4)

Re: Accountability by nono2sco, 02/15/2005 22:30:35 EST (3.00 / 3)

Re: Accountability by br3n, 02/15/2005 22:53:14 EST (3.50 / 4)

Re: Accountability by Potential Recruit, 02/16/2005 03:13:00 EST (1.50 / 4)

Bye bye spambot (none / 0) (#40)
by Potential Recruit on Tue Nov 28th, 2006 at 13:18:38 EST

This used to be a spambot post that is flooding the site. Due to volume, I had to resort to this while I work to block access by these bots. My apologies - thanks for your patience.

Jeff

Accountability | 40 comments (40 topical, 0 editorial, 3 hidden)

Recent Diaries

SCO has a Potential and Credible BILLION Dollar Liability
by ColonelZen - March 15

The Chinese Room Revisited, Thoughts on Consciousness
by ColonelZen - November 24
1 comment

Advocacy
by br3n - October 29
3 comments

An IPOWER ful experience
by ColonelZen - September 25
6 comments

Learning C#
by ColonelZen - September 23
1 comment

Getting ruby DBI for Mysql and Postgresql working on FC 6
by ColonelZen - March 7

Declaration of Linus Torvalds
by nedu - February 13
1 comment

Declaration of M. Douglas McIlroy
by nedu - February 12
6 comments

Declaration of Ulrich Drepper
by nedu - February 11
1 comment

Declaration of K. Y. Srinivasan
by nedu - February 11

More Diaries...