I think her writeup about her day out at the show really is worth another careful read. If you can, try to forget who it is and the context and your feelings. If you can read it like that, I think it tells a whole new tale - I doubt she wore a name badge.

Some of the things she has come out with and things she has done leave me angry. But for some time now, I have felt that she is not the real issue. Her article only reinforces my feeling that what she has done has been out of weakness, not strength. It seems to me that others have understood and exploited on her weaknesses.

I will probably need reminding from time to time, but it looks like it is time to leave her be, rather than give her cause to think the world is more hostile than it really is.

Is that supposed to make sense?

PJ didn't fit the demographic that they were after (visually), so the booth guy ignored her. So what? Do you think he's going to be fired for it? Gawd.

<<oh and dont miss the correction she got from eweek.<br> talk about tooting your own horn?>>

How is getting a correction from a news site that put words in your mouth "tooting your own horn"?

I recall you getting all uppity about your "rep" on SCOX when people there were tiring of you. That would be "tooting your own horn".

<<oh and BTW for the ones that criticised me writing "colzen you rock"? PFFFFFFTTTTT>>

That, in it's meaningless glory, is the most coherent argument you likely have ever made.

<<groklaw is just full of fanboy postings.>>

Thought you didn't go there. Presently they are discussing a host of F/OSS issues, unlike the people here, who either discuss themselves or criticize people who are actually doing something.

<<when you read the groklaw blog you see censorship still going on.>>

Again, you said you don't go there, so I guess you are simply making it up as you go along, as usual.

As for censorship, this place takes the cake on that one.

<<we can still hold our values up.<br> we judge posts fairly.>>

Complete, utter, unadulterated bull. Hell, you yourself ignore the guidelines by your ratings and by making up your own guidelines, as you did here!!! That is simply indefensible.

<<more than can be said for that legal research site.>>

One last brain dead dig at Groklaw. Devoid of truth in every measurable way, as usual.

She sits there all day long hitting reload on GL. As soon as PJ posts something br3n starts going into apoplexy. There is a sweet spot between recovering from apoplexy and the cessation of the foaming at the mouth. If she is near a computer at that point she starts spewing in her ipw diary.

Unfortunately, diaries can't be rated.

Just more senseless anti Groklaw yipping with nary a whiff of coherence or context.

At least you're consistent.