More importantly, I want to thank you for helping propel ip-wars.net into the top 100,000 sites according to netcraft.com. I'd say sometime in the last 10 days the site broke through 100,000 and I'm sure a lot of it has to do with folks following the news of your lawsuit. And, ip-wars.net is the third result in a search on your name. Cool!

So you admit to "hack[ing] search engines on the Internet through google spamming, google bombing, and other unlawful practices designed to tamper with Internet hosting computers and search engines"?  I feel a motion for PSJ coming on...

They are all full of terrible errors, and spelling mistakes ...  for instance Czechoslovakia has not existed since 1993.  The article posted was taken from the court records directly, and not passed on by any other party.

Probably the fed courts don't have that kind of self defense mechanism; but some sua-sponte motion to dismiss by the court is not unlikely, otherwise any response by any defendant pointing out a procedural error is likely to result in a complete dismissal.

I would bet money there's a green star, or piece of yellow tape, or orange bookmark, or blue paperclip attached to this which will let any hearing judge know this is squirrel bait, and "dismiss for any possible reason".

IANAL, just pointing out that bureaucracies do develop some mechanisms to cope with idiocy on this scale.   They don't work as well as might be desirable, but at some level they are likely to kick in.