By ColonelZen, Section Logbooks Posted on Tue Sep 13th, 2005 at 11:05:28 EST
-- TWZ
To me, it would be very important that != control To that end I want to see a fairly low entry point, which buys exactly 1 unit of ownership and control, and any further cash giving no further benefit. Similarly, purchases and transfers of stock should not allow any individual or organisation to gain more than 1 unit of ownership and control. 2 legs==4 legs = bad==good
If in discussions we raise potentialities for income streams which make it likely that IPW could survive as an ongoing concern and not simply exhaust the warchest over time, I may go for a higher level of investment.
Jeff
~ Merkey v The Internet et al Docs ~ Yahoeuvre ~ tuxrocks.com (SCO cases legal docs) ~ scofacts.org ~ eagle.petrofsky.org ~ Zen's Den ~ Yahoo SCOX Message Board ~ Lamlaw ~ Microsoft Watch ~ Groklaw ~ Korgwal - a Groklaw mirror ~ nosoftwarepatents.com ~ Flame Warriors ~ SCOXE Wars ~ Get your Merkey Number here! ~ Digital Law Online
Make a new account
Monday May 28th Why SCO Does Not Own the Unix Copyrights (0 comments)
Thursday April 5th It Can Really Happen - Eagle Broadband Delisting from AMEX (5 comments)
Monday March 12th OpenOffice.org Sends Open Letter to Dell (0 comments)
Tuesday March 6th Preliminary Order in Prohibition (2 comments)
Monday January 15th [Linux-ia64] optimizing __copy_user (12 comments)
Older Stories...