We also now have a declaration from Doe 2 and a Supplemental Reply in Support of the Motion to Strike. Combined, I found these the most interesting reading as they appear to lay the groundwork for getting the Motion to Strike granted on behalf of Doe 2. As we now learn, Doe 2 never owned any EAG stock nor was Doe 2 ever employed by a competitor or part of any stock scheme. Although I read through it pretty quickly, I thought Doe 2's attorney made some pretty good arguments in the Supplemental Reply in Support of the motion to strike. Nevertheless, I'm sure Eagle will provide arguments to counter at least some of this (they are attorney's after all).

I have not had time to really go through these items in depth - just a quick scan as I am about to head out of town. I also do not know how they relate to the document/item numbers maintained on Al's site documenting this case. Perhaps he will pick these up and figure out where they belong. In the meantime, I'm making them available here with some temporary names.

Thanks for reading,
Jeff

Defendant Doe 2's Supplemental Reply In Support Of Motion To Strike

Declaration of David Mowers In Support Of Doe 2's Supplemental Reply In Support Of Motion To Strike

Declaration of Shelley K. Mack In Support Of Doe 2's Supplemental Reply In Support Of Motion To Strike

Eagle Broadband's Reply In Support Of It's Motion To Seal Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And Declaration In Support Of Opposition To Doe 5's Motion For Attorneys' Fees