PJ ought to be so proud of this dig.i mean it isnt mean.no telling what the repercussions for the IBM salesguy.just a total disregard for how her blog might effect others lives.what total crap!
oh and dont miss the correction she got from eweek.
talk about tooting your own horn?

oh and BTW for the ones that criticised me writing "colzen you rock"? PFFFFFFTTTTT
groklaw is just full of fanboy postings.
try another tactic to attack me why dont you?
one post is not being a fanboy .in fact i have disagreed with lots here at different times.but we do discuss the differences instead of hiding them if they are well written and not accusatory.
so try discussion and see if you fair better.

when you read the groklaw blog you see censorship still going on.dont any anons dare to post the first topic "off topic here".it will get deleted/hidden.
so you want to criticise us hiding crap flooding but an anon just post an innocent topic and gets hidden.
as i say PFFFFFFFFFFFFTTTT.
we can still hold our values up.
we judge posts fairly.
more than can be said for *that* legal research site.

Grace Leong DAILY HERALD
SCO, in a statement issued Wednesday, said it was pleased with the court's order "denying without prejudice all three of IBM's motions to effectively dismiss SCO claims without a trial. Coupled with last month's ruling from the Magistrate Judge on discovery, we are now looking forward to proceeding with our case without delay and towards our day in court."

http://www.sltrib.com/business/ci_2562327
 SCO suit still alive but judge is peeved
Where's the evidence? He scolds the Utah firm while denying IBM's dismissal bid
By Bob Mims
The Salt Lake Tribune
A federal judge Wednesday refused to grant IBM's bids to dismiss a core portion of the SCO Group's $5 billion, Linux-related lawsuit - but not before criticizing some of the Utah company's courtroom tactics.
    In September, IBM asked U.S. District Judge Dale A. Kimball to declare that its use of Linux had not infringed on SCO's purported Unix copyrights. The Lindon software company, in its March 2003 suit against IBM and in subsequent suits against others, contends its Unix code was illegally incorporated into the freely distributed Linux operating system.

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/business/0,39020645,39187411,00.htm
SCO dodges knockout blow
Stephen Shankland
CNET News.com
A judge in the United States issued a damning indictment of SCO's case against IBM, citing the 'complete lack' of evidence, but did not grant a summary judgement in IBM's favour

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,600110921,00.html
Judge denies 5 motions in SCO-IBM case

By Brice Wallace
Deseret Morning News
A federal judge on Wednesday denied several motions key to the ongoing legal disputes between Lindon-based SCO Group and International Business Machines Corp.
      U.S. District Judge Dale A. Kimball denied one SCO motion and four IBM motions or cross-motions.
      Perhaps the most significant action Wednesday was Kimball saying it is "premature" to grant summary judgment on IBM's counterclaim that it does not infringe SCO's copyrights concerning Unix computer operating system software. He also denied a SCO motion to dismiss or stay that counterclaim.

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-5570265.html
Judge slams SCO's lack of evidence against IBM
By Stephen Shankland CNET News.com
The federal judge overseeing the SCO Group's suit against IBM regarding Unix and Linux has thwarted an IBM attempt to defang SCO's claims, but he also voiced loud skepticism about SCO's case.

http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id%3B813583771%3Bfp%3B16%3Bfpid%3B0
Judge declares SCO's lack of evidence 'astonishing'

Rodney Gedda

In a sign that the long-running battle between IBM and The SCO Group over alleged copyright infringement may be winding down, US district court judge Dale Kimball has labelled SCO's ability to provide evidence to support its case as astonishing and has denied the company's motion to dismiss a key counterclaim by IBM.

reading groklaw now is a very different experience to what it was when it start on radio web.then the only thing anyone was ever called on was language or making suggestions to illegal activity.
now if you ask a question about policy you find yourself constantly checking to see if your password still works or you post an explanation that you arent trolling but are just curious.
very sad that people are afraid of their account being closed for asking a question.try asking about a point of law that is contrary also to what is presented.

oh i know it is pj's blog but come on folks,get real.there are moral and ethical issues come up that are ignored.people keep saying to handle it privately but when you try that route she ignores it.if you speak out in public on another board you are subjected to the lowest accusations a person can dig up.even against your family is not too low.you might ought to reflect on that for awhile.
because to me if you open that and try to defend that position it can turn and bite you very bad.

everyone seems to forget i removed myself from groklaw and requested the deletion,because i was ashamed of the association to it.i tested the hypothesis and it proved correct by me being demoted from moderator position.i had taken that CHOICE.that wasnt pj's decision,it was mine and quit trying to rob me of that wise decision.