IP-Wars is a rallying point for everyone engaged in various battles involving intellectual property. IP-Wars is setup so that YOU decide what articles appear. You are invited to join by creating a new account so you can help in the IP Wars!
PLEASE NOTE - Anonymous posting temporarily disabled due to the spambot attack. It will be turned back on as soon as I can block this current wave of spambots. Sorry.
Did you know this site's content is primarily - YOURS? Yes, the site owner occasionally contributes an article (in between playing around with the Scoop stuff). But mostly, it is up to you our readers and members to write the articles about IP that you want others to know about.
Diary
A Compulsory Counterclaim for Novell?
By codswallet, Section Diary Posted on Fri Jul 8th, 2005 at 04:59:25 EST
Recently Mettler said on LamLaw that he thought that at the conclusion of SCO v. Novell, Novell would sue SCO for a declaratory judgment about the copyrights.
By codswallet, Section Diary Posted on Tue Jun 7th, 2005 at 04:59:39 EST
I've typed up the Wallace complaint so people who want to quote sectins of it will have something to work with. This is just the complaint - no commentary. I've added [sic] in a few places, that's it. I've kept the same line spacing and line breaks.
By codswallet, Section Diary Posted on Sun May 15th, 2005 at 16:20:14 EST
I posted this on Groklaw a fair while back. It's the latest publicly available statement by SCO of the legal basis for their claims against IBM. I think I have a point by point refutation lying around here somewhere to go with it, but I'll have to find it.
By codswallet, Section Diary Posted on Mon Apr 11th, 2005 at 18:28:01 EST
Ever wonder what the different companies that tossed Unix around like a hot potato actually paid and what they thought it was worth, once they had bought it?
By codswallet, Section Diary Posted on Mon Mar 28th, 2005 at 19:45:38 EST
For a while now I've been expecting IBM to ask that SCO pay for the enormous discovery they've worked so hard to get. I thought I'd analyze what chance IBM had with such a motion, when they would be most likely to file it and when it would be ruled on.