IP-Wars is a rallying point for everyone engaged in various battles involving intellectual property. IP-Wars is setup so that YOU decide what articles appear. You are invited to join by creating a new account so you can help in the IP Wars!
PLEASE NOTE - Anonymous posting temporarily disabled due to the spambot attack. It will be turned back on as soon as I can block this current wave of spambots. Sorry.
Did you know this site's content is primarily - YOURS? Yes, the site owner occasionally contributes an article (in between playing around with the Scoop stuff). But mostly, it is up to you our readers and members to write the articles about IP that you want others to know about.
Diary
MS Patent Problem
By heimdal31, Section Diary Posted on Thu Jul 14th, 2005 at 15:40:12 EST
I don't have time to write the article(s) I'd like with this information, but I provide a number of links to stories showing MS's patent infringements.
By heimdal31, Section Diary Posted on Wed Mar 16th, 2005 at 12:26:45 EST
Ever since SCOForum 2003, when SCO's "evidence" was shown to be junk within 24 hours but SCO's shareprice soared, I've had a page up on my site about Jonathan Cohen.
Stats_for_all has been continuing to dig into Cohen shenanigans. He posted something yesterday which just amply demonstrated the type of egregious actions that so typified the dot-com era, that I've put up a new page on Jonathan Cohen and JHC Capital.
It seems that the US Agriculture Department and WR Grace had patented in Europe an extract from an Indian tree for insecticide use. However, "the fungicide qualities of the neem tree and its use had been known in India for over 2,000 years." The article also includes this gem:
But in the United States, "prior existing knowledge" is only recognised if it is published in a journal - not if it has been passed down through generations of oral and folk traditions.
By heimdal31, Section Diary Posted on Mon Feb 21st, 2005 at 17:29:33 EST
Open source expert Bruce Perens, author of 15 books on the subject, said at a LinuxWorld news conference he was recently recruited as an expert witness for what was described as "the defining Linux patent infringement case" (he was later rejected because of conflicts of interest).
The above is a quote in a recent Australian ComputerWorld overview of LinuxWorld It is the only mention I've seen anywhere, but I would expect that there will be more details coming out soon.
I would imagine that he is under some type of NDA and can't say very much. In fact, I'm glad that he felt he could mention it at all. If someone is shopping for expert witnesses now, when do you think a suit will be filed?