Comment Ratings by ot hstoop

2) Re: Stallman weighs in on the Sun patents [4.00], by mck9, Rated: 4
Posted on 02/01/2005 23:00:52 EST
Rated on 02/02/2005 07:42:35 EST

3) Re: Order Regarding SCO'S Renewed Motion To Compel [3.77], by codswallet, Rated: 3
Posted on 01/20/2005 09:25:57 EST
Rated on 01/20/2005 09:34:42 EST

4) Re: Patents Pledged by IBM [4.50], by mikey, Rated: 5
Posted on 01/15/2005 00:31:18 EST
Rated on 01/18/2005 11:27:20 EST

5) Re: Munich Patents - A Close Up Look [4.28], by mikey, Rated: 5
Posted on 12/25/2004 00:12:44 EST
Rated on 12/27/2004 08:20:53 EST

6) New DCC Document at scofacts.org [3.66], by mikey, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/19/2004 12:27:05 EST
Rated on 12/20/2004 15:48:25 EST

7) Re: A Perplexing Patent Primer [4.00], by Sesostris III, Rated: 5
Posted on 12/11/2004 05:45:09 EST
Rated on 12/11/2004 17:55:44 EST

8) Pt 2: Internet resources intellectual property [3.75], by g hostwriter aka geeage aka, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/07/2004 16:40:08 EST
Rated on 12/07/2004 16:52:52 EST

9) Even more crap from SCO [3.57], by northsun, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/06/2004 14:08:36 EST
Rated on 12/06/2004 17:43:35 EST

10) Re: COMMENTS GUIDELINES AT GROKLAW UPDATE 4 DEC [2.00], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 2
Posted on 12/04/2004 15:43:57 EST
Rated on 12/06/2004 05:49:08 EST

11) Re: Cover bands [3.25], by nono2sco, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/05/2004 16:06:08 EST
Rated on 12/05/2004 17:34:48 EST

12) Re: Request for rating [3.85], by pgk, Rated: 4
Posted on 12/03/2004 11:24:02 EST
Rated on 12/03/2004 13:09:52 EST

13) Re: A Plan That Even SCO Might Admire [4.40], by codswallet, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/02/2004 04:48:56 EST
Rated on 12/02/2004 08:41:37 EST

14) Re: BGE/Groklaw Arbitration [3.87], by nathanh, Rated: 4
Posted on 12/02/2004 03:03:46 EST
Rated on 12/02/2004 05:21:34 EST

15) Re: BGE/Groklaw Arbitration [4.94], by harlan wilkerson, Rated: 5
Posted on 12/01/2004 20:58:53 EST
Rated on 12/02/2004 05:21:34 EST

16) hot story [3.71], by br3n, Rated: 4
Posted on 12/01/2004 14:34:06 EST
Rated on 12/01/2004 16:18:02 EST

17) Re: hot story [3.87], by pgk, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/01/2004 15:36:39 EST
Rated on 12/01/2004 16:17:49 EST

18) Re: hot story [3.75], by jbellis, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/01/2004 15:29:43 EST
Rated on 12/01/2004 16:17:49 EST

19) Wonderful news. [2.92], by Potential Recruit, Rated: 2
Posted on 12/01/2004 12:19:53 EST
Rated on 12/01/2004 14:32:05 EST

20) Re: O'Gara Requests SCO v IBM Sealed Docs Released [3.75], by br3n, Rated: 3
Posted on 12/01/2004 11:56:27 EST
Rated on 12/01/2004 14:32:05 EST

21) Is my name in a comment header CMI? [4.58], by tomas, Rated: 4
Posted on 11/30/2004 22:17:24 EST
Rated on 12/01/2004 12:22:33 EST

22) "MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS DENIED" [4.13], by Al Petrofsky, Rated: 3
Posted on 11/30/2004 16:34:21 EST
Rated on 11/30/2004 17:14:21 EST

23) Motion DENIED... [3.69], by eamacnaghten, Rated: 3
Posted on 11/30/2004 10:04:50 EST
Rated on 11/30/2004 17:14:21 EST

24) Re: SCO moves to stay the Daimler case [3.46], by yern4, Rated: 3
Posted on 11/30/2004 08:36:44 EST
Rated on 11/30/2004 17:14:21 EST

25) Re: Appeal deadline [3.55], by ruidh, Rated: 3
Posted on 11/30/2004 11:57:10 EST
Rated on 11/30/2004 15:36:18 EST

26) Re: Appeal deadline [3.11], by ruidh, Rated: 3
Posted on 11/30/2004 08:14:47 EST
Rated on 11/30/2004 09:11:37 EST

27) Re: Breaking News, Hot Topics, Interesting Links [4.00], by pgk, Rated: 3
Posted on 11/19/2004 04:57:08 EST
Rated on 11/25/2004 11:12:19 EST

28) Re: Breaking News, Hot Topics, Interesting Links [4.00], by groendraak, Rated: 4
Posted on 11/21/2004 23:51:02 EST
Rated on 11/25/2004 11:10:31 EST

29) Re: The CFO's View of Open Source [3.33], by br3n, Rated: 3
Posted on 11/20/2004 10:09:11 EST
Rated on 11/20/2004 11:07:32 EST

30) Re: The CFO's View of Open Source [3.50], by wonboodoo, Rated: 3
Posted on 11/20/2004 09:24:31 EST
Rated on 11/20/2004 11:06:45 EST